To celebrate the beginnings of my
reviewing blog I am going to try to start it with a triple creature feature. That’s right, three films filled with
bloodthirsty monsters. Not just any
monsters but Grendel and his mother.
That’s right, two of the biggest named monsters in ancient
literature. Well, okay, two of the
three films are actually more realistic depictions and so in them Grendel only
really counts as some sort of Neanderthal-like species. Scary, right?
Because I’m sure you are like me and Australopithecus haunted your
nightmares when you were a kid, too, correct?
Ah, well, one out of three ain’t bad.
The first film I will discuss is the
movie Beowulf and Grendel was released in 2005 and aimed at humanizing the
scourge of Heorot. In this film Grendel
is more the hero than Beowulf and far from being treated as an evil descendant
of Cain is (intended to be) portrayed as a wronged and persecuted troll. Let me
just begin by saying this film replaces archetypal themes completely with
political correctness. The film begins where a young Grendel (played by a child
actor with fake facial hair) witnesses Hrothgar murder his father before his
eyes and swears revenge on the Danes.
For those of you familiar with the poem you are probably calling
bullshit on this since the poem says this of Grendel and his mother, “They are
fatherless creatures, and their whole ancestry is hidden in a past of demons
and ghosts. They dwell apart among
wolves on the hills, on windswept crags and treacherous keshes, where cold streams
pour down the mountain and disappear under mist and moorland.” Oh yeah, and Grendel killed people because he
was an evil descendent of Cain not because of daddy issues. Still I find this change somewhat forgivable
in the sense that that line makes little sense taken literally considering we
already know the lines Patriarch.
Maybe Beowulf will be more
interesting at least? I mean he was
played by Gerard Butler the man who was Leonidas in 300. That film may be stupid
but it certainly had great action sequences.
Surely he can bring on the action like few else. Nope, Beowulf does just about nothing of
importance in this film. He mainly talks
with Hrothgar and Grendel, gets angsty about whether he is doing the right
thing, gets bitched at by his designated love interest (the worst character by
far), and then gets angsty some more.
Get this, this trainwreck is the only adaption of the poem where Beowulf
doesn’t kill Grendel. Instead Grendel
chops off his own arm after getting trapped by a rope after raiding Heorot. The
protagonist in this film is useless. The small action scenes are mainly garbage.
He is a far cry from the Beowolf from the poem who can swim for five days while
killing nine sea-beasts. To the films
credit Butler is given one chance to display his skill in a cool but extremely
short action scene which is unfortunately used as a cutaway gag. Beowulf tells someone that he doesn’t get mad
during fights and then it cuts to him having an admittedly awesome fight where
an enraged Beowulf takes on a gang of guys and then cuts back to his smug
face. I hate this film.
Hrothgar, the famed Danish king,
can be summed up in three words in this film, whipped, drunkard and coward. His wife berates him for being shocked by
Grendel’s massacre of his people. Unlike
the king who would drink at feasts to be merry now he drinks to try to appease
his guilt for pissing off Grendel. He
expresses a deep fear of death and hell which later drives him to convert to
Christianity which was preached by a freaky mercenary who would randomly froth
at the mouth. Yeah this film is pretty
blatant with its antichristian stance even though by the time Beowulf was
written down it was fully Christianized.
I really resent being beaten over the head with an message like this irregardless if I agree with it or not.
The film tells us that Grendel
won’t kill Hrothgar because even though he killed his father he spared him as a
child. For that the kind-hearted Grendel
instead murders innocent Danes who have no connection with his father’s
death. Such benevolence! This might make sense with the wergild (or
man-price) and blood-feud concept of the time period was properly explained and
included but considering this film is totally modernized Grendel is really just
a prick. The film crappily crams down
the idea that Grendel has the moral high ground so much that Hrothgar totally
becomes the most likeable character.
Someone who actually wants to kill Grendel and not talk about their
feelings with him? I like this cat
already! Oh and Hrothgar totally cusses
like a sailor (Viking?) which is so idiotic it is funny and gives the movie all
its best lines.
Grendel’s father was not the only new character to be
introduced. The writer knowing that the
poem Beowulf had almost no women and in an attempt to try to expand the
demographic of the movie created an important female character, Selma. The pagan witch Selma is the typical
Hollywood character type of the prostitute with a heart of gold. It is implied throughout the film that she
has some strong tie to Grendel. It is
later revealed that Grendel once raped her in the night and she gave birth to
his half-troll son. Even though this is
a heinous crime, she is fiercely protective of Grendel and her true anger is
directed against what she views as the true evil, the Danes. Making matters more bizarre she is meant to
be portraying a female role model despite her justifying her own rape. The implications of this plot I frankly find
gross and disturbing. But the worst part
of all is she probably could have convinced Grendel to stop his rampages at any
time, and saved countless lives, had she actually wanted to. While she is intended to be a feminist
character she seems to be one in the Valerie Salonas mold.
I
really wish beastiality wasn’t an important part of so many Beowulf films. This film is probably the worst offender of
all due to its hypocrisy. At one point
Hrothgar makes fun of a rival king, Sig, who he claimed had sex with animals
and Beowulf ate it up and laughed uproariously. Considering Grendel is indeed
mentally retarded and forced sex upon someone the acts are really not all that
different. Then the movie expects us to
go awww to the interspecies rape towards the end. Beowulf then has sex with Selma herself after
she tells him about it because….uh. What
the hell movie?
After
Grendel dies of his self-inflicted wounds his mother flips out and starts
killing people. She is some sort of
sea-hag like in the poem which I would be thankful for if it didn’t completely
defeat the purpose of making Grendel halfway realistic. Anyway Beowulf kills her in a scene not even
the movie seems to care about.
Seriously, Grendel’s kid watches the murder of the sea-hag but he gives
up on revenge after Beowulf pays his respects to Grendel’s grave. The kid is not at all concerned about his
grandmother as she was clearly filler anyway.
Beowulf sails off again to be useless elsewhere. Roll credits.
Don’t
get me wrong I love bad movies but this film is just unforgivable. My final verdict is a 1/5 due to the anachronistic
profanity being somewhat funny for a few minutes. I award
no points for the beautiful shots of Iceland because even if you film in a
beautiful location that doesn’t fix a horrible film. The film is very much a product of being
created in the Bush years. Just as The Crucible is more about McCarthyism
than witchcraft, Beowulf and Grendel
feels more like a backlash against the cultural stereotype of good Americans
and evil terrorists than an serious attempt at retelling Beowulf. Considering that the archetypes that Beowulf is based on are timeless, I
think it a shame to use them to comment on current cultural attitudes that can
change like the wind. Just as Grendel
pisses on the door to Heorot in the beginning of the film writer Andrew Berzins
pisses on the poem. Also like troll
piss, this film really stinks. Overall, I cannot recommend this
film to anyone but considering the name of this blog chances are you might just
watch it anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment